DeFlock Auburn Ca Submit Comment

Live, work or shop in Auburn?

Chances are, you're
being illegally searched.

Placer County's automated license plate reader cameras – known as ALPRs – are logging every car that passes: against California law ❌ Civil Code § 1798.90.55(b) (part of SB 34, 2015) states that a public agency shall not sell, share, or transfer ALPR information, except to another public agency, and only as otherwise permitted by law. Under California law, a "public agency" is explicitly defined as an in-state, non-federal agency. , without an warrant, with no public oversight, and at your own expense. Explore the data and stand with your neighbors to take action.

WHAT'S HAPPENING

232 ALPR cameras in Placer County (deflock.org)
20M+ Total external searches of Auburn and Placer County Sheriff's Office cameras since 2022
4.8M Searches conducted by out-of-state or federal agencies, violating California Civil Code
4K+ Federal or Out-of-state agencies accessed your data AFTER Civil Code § 1798.90.55(b) took effect

WHAT'S HAPPENING  //  LOCATIONS

WHERE + WHAT TO LOOK FOR

Community-reported ALPR camera locations. If you spot one that's missing, add it to the map.

ALPRs are continually being added at highly-trafficked locations. Flock cameras typically have: Black housing · Teardrop shape · Usually with solar panels

An ALPR camera mounted on a pole with a solar panel, against a blue sky

WHAT'S HAPPENING  //  LACK OF TRANSPARENCY

How many searches lack a substantive reason?

10,140,586*

*We made an additional request that PCSO supply the "reason" fields, but they refused.

All of Placer Country Sheriff Office's ~8.6M searches have the reason hidden, and ~1.4M (about 12.5%) of Auburn PD's are either blank or use non-substantive strings such as "Inv" or "n/a."You can't claim to be accountable if the one field that proves accountability, is the one field you won't hand over.

WHY IT MATTERS

OUR CONCERNS

PRIVACY + DATA SHARING

  • Cameras track your license plate, location, time, and direction of travel. They record pedestrian activity, perceived demographics, and any unique identifiers. All that data is now under corporate control.
  • ALPRs can be extended with ever-more-invasive surveillance technology, such as sensors that track the unique identifiers in your phone, your wearables, your infotainment systems, your Bluetooth devices- even your pet's microchip- to enable identification.

HIGH COST, LOW EFFECTIVENESS

  • The Placer County Sherriff's office stated that ZERO? crimes were solved as a result of the use of a Flock camera.[to verify]
  • Auburn's 2022 service agreement with Flock Group Inc. showed costs of $2,500 - $3,250 per camera; in 2023 PCSO approved a 2-year, $236,600 contract for 42 Flock cameras. Meanwhile, many of them end up stolen, vandalized, stripped for parts, or dumped in the canal.

SECURITY RISK

  • Flock employees have demonstrated their ability to observe playgrounds and children's gymnastics rooms.
  • We found 219 searches in which Flock Inc. itself accessed Auburn's cameras.
  • Dozens of law enforcement officers have abused it to stalk romantic interests.
  • It's been used to surveil people seeking abortions in Texas.

LACK OF PUBLIC CONSENT

  • They never asked us: The California Code, Civil Code - CIV § 1798.90.5 states: "a public agency that operates or intends to operate an ALPR system shall provide an opportunity for public comment at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the governing body of the public agency before implementing the program."
  • They are eyesores: cities cancel contracts and must cover them up with trash bags

THE DATA  //  FIRST-PASS AUDIT

WE FOUND MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL SEARCHES

  • Civil Code § 1798.90.55(b) SB 34, effective January 1, 2016 bars any California public agency from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR data except to another California public agency; out-of-state and federal agencies don't qualify.
  • October 2023 California Attorney General issued Information Bulletin 2023-DLE-06, reminding agencies of this law and explicitly warning against sharing ALPR data with immigration enforcement agencies like ICE and CBP.
  • October 2025 California Attorney General sued the City of El Cajon for violating this exact statute.
  • We found several federal agencies logged as "inactive" only after their access had already occurred.
  • SOURCES: CIV. CODE § 1798.90.55(b) (SB 34, 2016) · CAL. AG BULLETIN 2023-DLE-06 · CAL. AG v. EL CAJON (2025)

    4,811,034 Searches conducted by federal and out-of-state agencies, in violation of Civil Code § 1798.90.55(b) (SB 34)
    4,406 Prohibited agencies accessed Auburn/Placer cameras
    535,727 Searches by NCRIC, a Federal fusion center
    10 Searches conducted by US Border Patrol, in violation of Civil Code § 1798.90.55(b) (SB 34)

    THE DATA  //  FEDERAL + OUT-OF-STATE ACCESS

    WHO'S LOOKING?

    Over 3 Million searches were conducted by 4,314 non-California entities, despite it being prohibited. Here are the top-accessing agencies and their # of searches:

    Houston TX PD
    849,831
    Dallas TX PD
    101,330
    Cobb County GA SO
    34,656
    New York State Police
    33,414
    Fort Worth TX PD
    32,202
    Fairfax County VA PD
    28,238
    Oklahoma City OK PD
    26,841
    Illinois State Police
    26,570
    NCRIC (Federal Fusion Center)
    535,727

    SOURCES: CPRA-OBTAINED AUDIT LOG FILES · CAL. CIVIL CODE § 1798.90.55(b) PROHIBITS SHARING WITH NON-CALIFORNIA ENTITIES

    LEARN

    FIND OUT MORE

    Get the Flock Out.

    Attend a Board of Supervisors or City Council meeting. Talk to your neighbors. Share what you found here. Surveillance only works when people don't know it's happening.

    TAKE ACTION

    LET'S DEMAND...

    End the Flock Contracts

    A substantial wave of cities and towns have ended or declined to renew their Flock Safety contracts. Auburn's residents deserve the same choice, made in the open.

    Explain the Stripped Records and Illegal Access

    Every 'reason' column was removed from the PCSO public records, while out-of-state and federal agencies have queried Auburn's camera data. Residents can't audit what they can't see.

    No New Surveillance Tech Contracts

    If the public is to be subject to any new or expanded surveillance technology, now or in the future, they deserve to know the details and implications- and to have a say in the matter.

    TAKE ACTION  //  PUBLIC COMMENT

    DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY? READ THIS.

    My name is [your name]. I'm a resident of Auburn and I've lived here for [number] years. Auburn's own Flock audit logs show over 11 million external searches of our camera network —including federal agencies like the FBI and ATF, and thousands of out-of-state agencies that California law doesn't allow this data to go to. I'm asking the Council to end the Flock contract, release the full unredacted audit logs, and commit to no new surveillance technology without a public vote. Thank you for your time.

    Auburn City Council meetings

    are on the 2nd and 4th Monday of each month, at 6pm, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall1225 Lincoln Way Auburn, CA

    Make a Public Comment

    Placer County
    Board of Supervisor meetings

    are on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month, at 9am, in the Placer County Administrative Center175 Fulweiler Ave. in Auburn, CA

    Make a Public Comment

    TAKE ACTION  //  EMAIL

    SEND AN EMAIL.

    Speaking up in person is the most effective thing you can do, but sending a quick email helps too. Here's who to contact, and a pre-written email you can copy, paste, and personalize.

    TAKE ACTION  //  STAY IN THE LOOP

    JOIN THE MAILING LIST

    Get updates on public records requests, meeting alerts, and actions you can take. No spam — we'll only email when it matters.